
What carries over and what does not
3 minDifficulty Checked 2026-11-10- Only the asset carries over. Accounts, wallets, rules and validators are separate.
- A contract bug on the sidechain is not an XRP Ledger bug, and the reverse.
- Three programmability paths exist: the EVM sidechain, Hooks on Xahau and the Smart Escrows draft.
People often ask if the XRP Ledger "has smart contracts now." The honest answer has three parts, and each part is a different place.
- The EVM sidechain. Ethereum-style contracts on a separate chain that uses XRP for fees.
- Xahau. Another separate network, where small programs called Hooks attach to accounts.
- Smart Escrows. A draft for the XRP Ledger itself. Not live, and not in voting.
So today, custom code runs beside the XRP Ledger, not on it.
When you step onto the sidechain, one thing comes with you: XRP. The rest stays behind.
- Your account stays behind. You use a different kind of address and a different wallet.
- The rules stay behind. Reserves, trust lines and destination tags are XRP Ledger rules. The sidechain has its own.
- The validators stay behind. A different group confirms sidechain blocks.
- The track record stays behind. A contract is only as safe as its code. The XRP Ledger's history says nothing about a contract someone deployed last week.
The separation also protects you. A failed contract on the sidechain cannot reach into an XRP Ledger account. Only funds that crossed the bridge are exposed to what happens there.
| XRP Ledger | XRPL EVM sidechain | |
|---|---|---|
| Custom contracts | No | Yes, EVM bytecode |
| Fee token | XRP | XRP, bridged and minted |
| Consensus | XRP Ledger consensus, each server picks its UNL | CometBFT, Proof of Authority |
| Rule changes | Amendments, more than 80% for two weeks | The chain's own software upgrades |
| Wallets | XRP Ledger wallets | EVM wallets such as MetaMask |
| Explorer | XRP Ledger explorers | explorer.xrplevm.org, built on Blockscout |
| Chain ID | Not applicable | 1440000 |
No shared validation. xrpl.org states that sidechains use their own validators and a separate UNL, and that nodes on each chain have no knowledge of the other. An XRP Ledger server never executes or checks a sidechain contract.
No shared governance. The XRP Ledger's amendment list has no entry for the EVM sidechain. Nothing about it is voted on by XRP Ledger validators. The sidechain's network page lists its own upgrades by block height, from genesis through v10.1 on 2026-07-20.
The three programmability paths:
| Path | Runs on | Status on 2026-11-10 |
|---|---|---|
| EVM contracts | XRPL EVM sidechain | Live on that chain |
| Hooks | Xahau | Live on that network |
| Smart Escrows | XRP Ledger | Draft. Amendment in development, not votable |
Reading claims carefully. "On the XRPL" and "on the XRPL EVM" are different statements. A token, pool or app on the sidechain does not appear in account_lines, amm_info or any other XRP Ledger API. Check which chain a product runs on before you compare it with a ledger feature such as the AMM.
Related: Smart Escrows, Hooks and Xahau, XChainBridge.
- XRPL SidechainsRead 2026-11-10
- What is the XRPL EVM Sidechain?Read 2026-11-10
- Connect to the XRPL EVM SidechainRead 2026-11-10
- XRPL EVM explorerRead 2026-11-10
- Known AmendmentsRead 2026-11-10
- XLS-100 Smart EscrowsRead 2026-11-10
- XahauRead 2026-11-10
